I think getting the basics right will be enough work for the moment. There's nothing to say that we can't ponder a syntax for this type of verification, however. I'd love suggestions. -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>wrote: > I also checked with Adam Barth and he mentioned that the V8 team is > looking at incrementally processing JS as it comes over the wire. This > kinda also matches what Boris said about Gecko. > > Thus, we definitely want a progressive authentication mechanism but I > also think we can defer it to version 2 of the spec. > > Thanks > Dev > >
Received on Friday, 17 January 2014 08:50:38 UTC