W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > August 2014

Re: [REFERRER] Naming none and null policies

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:37:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78iR8_HhheaL+ws0-SYm7ppWFJ-Fz9cmCnXp4v_6hSZB9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ángel <angel@16bits.net>
Cc: WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Ángel <angel@16bits.net> wrote:
> I would prefer if it was named with a more dissimilar word such as
> ‘empty’ or ‘omit’.

"omit" seems better than "empty" since I think that is the actual
effect. "no-referrer" would be another option (similar to "no-cors").

Received on Tuesday, 19 August 2014 08:38:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:06 UTC