- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:11:40 +0000
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: Neil Matatall <neilm@twitter.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > I can't come up with any clever exploits that would be caused by sending the > response code of the protected resource (perhaps as "document-status" next > to "document-uri"?), and there's apparently some marginal value to adding > it. That doesn't mean there aren't any, however... Fly-by-comment, can we still rename those to "-url"? The whole platform uses URL, not URI... -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 22:12:07 UTC