W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > October 2012

RE: Resolution of post-Last Call comments on CSP 1.0 by Fred Andrews and Boris Zbarsky

From: Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal-inc.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 19:26:04 +0000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
CC: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, "Fred Andrews (fredandw@live.com)" <fredandw@live.com>
Message-ID: <370C9BEB4DD6154FA963E2F79ADC6F2E29F445@DEN-EXDDA-S12.corp.ebay.com>
Yes, that's it.  We just wanted to make sure you were aware of the group's resolution to not make any modifications to the 1.0 specification based on your comments, in case you felt our consideration was not adequate and you wanted to re-raise the issue.

Thank you,

Brad Hill

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbarsky@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 11:03 AM
> To: Thomas Roessler
> Cc: Hill, Brad; public-webappsec@w3.org; Fred Andrews (fredandw@live.com)
> Subject: Re: Resolution of post-Last Call comments on CSP 1.0 by Fred
> Andrews and Boris Zbarsky
> 
> On 10/13/12 1:33 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> > On 2012-10-12, at 18:11 -0400, "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal-inc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We will hold off publishing the CR of CSP 1.0 for one week from this date
> (October 12) to give these individuals an opportunity to re-raise these
> concerns if they do not feel the WG has adequately addressed them.
> >
> > Also, if Fred and Boris agree with the disposition of their comments, an
> explicit "ok" would be nice -- in which case we can move on more quickly.
> 
> I think I missed the exact disposition we're talking about.  Was there anything
> other than the thread where Adam and I argued a bit?
> 
> -Boris
Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 19:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 15 October 2012 19:26:33 GMT