W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Transition Request: Content Security Policy to FPWD

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 08:22:23 -0500
Message-ID: <4ED4DC8F.1040104@nokia.com>
To: ext Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal-inc.com>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
CC: public-webappsec@w3.org, "Brandon Sterne (bsterne@mozilla.com)" <bsterne@mozilla.com>, "Adam Barth (w3c@adambarth.com)" <w3c@adambarth.com>
Please add a "Latest Editor's Draft" link *before* the FPWD is published.

(See CORS http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-cors-20100727/ for an example).

-Thanks, Art Barstow

On 11/29/11 8:16 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2011-11-29, at 14:15 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>
>> Thanks and congratulations, Brad, EKR, Brandon, Adam.  Short name and 
>> transition approved.
>>
>> Before we publish this, the status section should have a few brief 
>> words that are non-boilerplate.  In this case, it may be useful to 
>> point out that the spec is unusually mature for an FPWD, and that 
>> experimental implementations already exist.
>
> Also, perhaps worth pointing out that the websec WG's requirements 
> draft is relevant to this document.
>
>> Once that text is in the draft, I'll proceed with a publication 
>> request; let's aim at this Thursday as the publication date.
>>
>> Thanks much,
>> --
>> Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org <mailto:tlr@w3.org>>  (@roessler 
>> <https://twitter.com/roessler>)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2011-11-29, at 01:07 +0100, Hill, Brad wrote:
>>
>>> Thomas,
>>> On behalf of the Web Application Security WG we request that the 
>>> Content Security Policy specification transition to First Public 
>>> Working Draft in the following location:
>>> Content Security Policy (CSP)
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-CSP-20111128/
>>> This can be published effective immediately (Nov 28).
>>> The abstract and scope may be found in the document itself, 
>>> currently at:
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/raw-file/fa99d551900f/csp-specification.dev.html
>>> The WG has documented its agreement to advance this document by 
>>> issuing a Call for Consensus, 
>>> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2011Nov/0014.html), 
>>> resolved issues raised thereby, and agreed to proceed during our 
>>> call on Nov 22. (http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-webappsec-minutes.html)
>>> Thank you,
>>> Brad Hill
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:22:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:22:43 GMT