W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Agenda for WebAppSec WG Call, Nov 22, 22:00-23:00 UTC

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:09:12 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia-ji6RzWj4K_VTkudA=_iRb9vrSS8pChO6cgQ7Nx+=JyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal-inc.com>
Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Should we add something to the agenda to discuss whether we like the
refactoring of the spec in
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/raw-file/tip/experimental.html
?

Thanks,
Adam


On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal-inc.com> wrote:
> Agenda for WebAppSec WG call
>
>
>
> DATE: November 22, 2011
>
> TIME: 22:00-23:00 UTC (14:00-15:00 PST)
>
>
>
> +1.617.761.6200; PIN 92794 ('WASWG') and  #webappsec on irc.w3.org:6665
>
> (Or VoIP via the Zakim SIP bridge:
> http://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/Zakim-SIP)
>
>
>
> 22:00-22:03         1              Scribe Selection
>
> 22:03-22:05         2              Roll Call
>
> 22:05-22:09         3              Create Scribe Round-Robin List
>
> 22:09-22:11         4              Minutes of TPAC F2F, Oct 31, Nov 1
>
> 22:11-22:15         5              Agenda bashing
>
> 22:15-22:25         6              Review open actions in Tracker
>
> 22:25-22:35         7              Approving CSP as FPWD (more below)
>
> 22:35-22:45         8              Testing activity
>
> 22:45-22:50         9              Status on CORS, schedule to move CORS to
> FPWD? (ACTION-16)
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/describecomponents.cgi?product=WebAppsSec
>
> 22:50-23:00         10           Draft requirements for Anti-Clickjacking
> work
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/Security/wiki/Anti-Clickjacking_Requirements
>
>
>
>
>
> Details on item 6:
>
>
>
> A call for consensus was issued
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2011Nov/0014.html) to
> move the CSP draft at
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/raw-file/tip/csp-specification.dev.html
> to FPWD.
>
>
>
> Consensus has so far been positive, with two issues raised:
>
>
>
> 1. Adding sandbox directive to v1.0, with an ISSUE paragraph indicating that
> it may not make 1.0 final. (Jacob Rossi)
>
>
>
> 2. Editorial notes from Robin Berjon:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2011Nov/0016.html
>
>
>
> Brad Hill
>
> cell: 206.245.7844 / skype: hillbrad
>
> email: bhill@paypal-inc.com
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 01:10:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 November 2011 01:10:16 GMT