RE: CFC: Republish Pointer Lock as CR from Léonie Watson on 2016-06-21 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2016)

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:18:04 +0100
To: "'Takayoshi Kochi'" <kochi@google.com>, "'Vincent Scheib'" <scheib@google.com>
Cc: "'Dylan Barrell'" <dylan.barrell@deque.com>, "'Michiel Bijl'" <michiel@agosto.nl>, "'public-webapps WG'" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <12c0501d1cba6$3832d480$a8987d80$@tink.uk>

 

 

From: Takayoshi Kochi [mailto:kochi@google.com] 
“I'm fine without Shadow DOM changes, because no one yet implemented the intended change to the spec yet,

and so it could be immature to include in a "CR".   (Does CR require at least 2 implementors exist?)”

 

Yes, CR requires at least two implementations in shipping browsers. Once Pointer Lock is at Recc, hopefully the Shadow DOM content will be stable enough to include in Pointer Lock next.

 

 

Thanks for your help with this.

 

 

 

-- 

@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

 

Léonie.

Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:18:59 UTC