Re: Shadow DOM spec for v1 is ready to be reviewed

Thank you for the feedback! Let me take a look at the filed issues. I
really appreciate it.
It looks  https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 is the only
conceptual problem. I think I can send "Intent to Implement: Shadow DOM v1"
in Blink soon. :)

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:43 AM Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote:

> Thanks for the update!
>
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 11:33 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@google.com> wrote:
>
> Let me post a quick update for the Shadow DOM spec:
> https://w3c.github.io/webcomponents/spec/shadow/
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__w3c.github.io_webcomponents_spec_shadow_&d=BQMFaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=051zrPFUkWGMfGlKdhy9Uw&m=Ob0zDi81QSdDXfbw7D4TwLer5St-dE9GmsZoIHDLcqM&s=ao7lIY8fDs6pqDsJ_OCg2uo6IX3xsRHMs575RmV_ZCE&e=>
>
> I've almost done the spec work for Shadow DOM v1. I think it's time to be
> reviewed and get feedback. I hope that a browser vendor, including me, can
> start to implement it based on the current spec.
>
> You might want to use https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/289
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_w3c_webcomponents_issues_289&d=BQMFaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=051zrPFUkWGMfGlKdhy9Uw&m=Ob0zDi81QSdDXfbw7D4TwLer5St-dE9GmsZoIHDLcqM&s=KbtdA0FA-hhRaB8W46DFmZ_DI9PMd0dE8iGwvJ1x61Y&e=>
> to give me feedback. Please feel free to file a new issue if preferred.
>
>
> I've filed a bunch of editorial issues.
>
> One conceptual problem I have with the current spec is how it "unwrap"
> nested slots.  I thought we had a consensus not to do this at F2F?
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/308 tracks this particular
> issue.
>
> - R. Niwa
>
>