- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 13:09:41 +0900
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Cc: Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Arron Eicholz <arronei@microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: > Given that all vendors agreed that "C" can wait until v2, we could just > focus on concretizing the "slots" proposal and then put a lid on Shadow DOM > v1. > > What do you think, folks? This probably works for Mozilla. It would be good to see the proposed processing model and its implications for an eventual imperative API. It's somewhat troubling we don't agree on synchronous vs when-layout-or-event-dispatch-happens. Also, I suggest we bikeshed the markup in the direction of slot=some-slot-name and <slot name=some-slot-name> rather than content-slot=some-slot-name and <content slot=some-slot-name>. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2015 04:10:05 UTC