- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 15:07:27 +0200
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Cc: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>, Justin Fagnani <justinfagnani@google.com>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Erik Bryn <erik@erikbryn.com>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote: > OK. So the claim that the current spec cannot be interoperably implemented is false? Well, the wording could be improved for sure. If you're new to this you might get confused. > Why can't we say that this distributedCallback must be invoked at the same time that the current spec updates the distribution result? Since it sounds like there is no interop problem with this timing, I don't understand why this wouldn't be an option. Because then it would be observable when distribution happens and then it does become a problem. The current specification allows for lazy distribution. Once distribution is observable while distributing that is no longer an option. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2015 13:07:54 UTC