- From: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:41:27 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Ted Mielczarek <ted@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Katelyn Gadd <kg@luminance.org>
Step where you need to, to avoid falling over :-P. The problems with generalized/extensible clone are clear but we have structured clone already. It is based on a hardcoded type-case statement. It could be improved a bit without trying to solve all possible problems, IMHO. /be Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Joshua Bell<jsbell@google.com> wrote: >> > If we're not dragging in the notion of extensibility, is there complication? > > I would be fine with adding an API without extensibility. I was just > afraid we might step on TC39's toes, but maybe since they're not > helping out with structured clones that's okay?
Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 22:41:58 UTC