- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:10:24 +0200
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me> wrote: > My argument is that it's not materially different from existing permissions APIs. Sometimes the promise is rejected, sometimes it isn't. (Note that either outcome could happen without the user ever seeing a prompt.) The code works in every browser---some just follow the denied code path, and some follow the accepted code path. That's fine: web pages already need to handle that. But they won't. Once web developers figure out the Secret Sauce to make it work in browser X and browser X has enough market share, they'll just add Secret Sauce and require X. And everyone competing with X will have to add support for Secret Sauce, whether they want to or not. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2015 17:10:48 UTC