- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 13:54:58 -0500
- To: chaals@yandex-team.ru, Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 11/7/14 1:05 PM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: > 07.11.2014, 18:28, "Domenic Denicola" <d@domenic.me>: >>> On Nov 7, 2014, at 17:55, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html >>> Should this not include a reference to https://xhr.spec.whatwg.org/? >> Or better yet, just be a redirect to it, as was done with WHATWG's DOM Parsing spec to the W3C one? > That doesn't work with the way W3C manages its work and paper trails. > > But yeah, a pointer is a pretty obvious thing to put in. Yes, sorry, I meant to include that. I just checked in a patch that adds a reference and link for WebApps' XHRL1 spec and the WHATWG spec above. That patch add this info to the SotD section <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/default/TR/XHRL2-Note-2014-Nov.html#sotd>. Currently, the Draft Note does not include Latest Editor's Draft data in its boilerplate. If we want to add that data, it's not clear if we want to add WebApps' ED and/or WHATWG's spec. Strong preferences? -Thanks, AB
Received on Friday, 7 November 2014 18:55:25 UTC