- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:29:59 +0000
- To: Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Michael van Ouwerkerk <mvanouwerkerk@google.com> wrote: > This means that if the Push API is implemented around these systems, vendor > specific registration details must be provided. It seems terrible if we take the existing constraints of those push backends. If developers had to register their site with each of them to get a working solution. And then if you came along with a new piece of hardware with a different push backend you'd have to convince the long tail of web sites to upgrade to adapt to your backend. That does not work. The proposal the draft has today where browser hands out a URL for you to ping from your server after the user has consented seems fairly sane. It would be great to hear what the problems are with that approach from Google et al. The web is a distributed platform, we should not tie its APIs around a couple of vendors that are relevant today. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 24 March 2014 15:30:27 UTC