- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 07:36:23 +1100
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Great. I applied those changes to the current ED. It might lack a bit of clarity but I will integrate Promises soon so I will likely revisit the language later. -- Mounir On Sat, 15 Mar 2014, at 5:36, Jonas Sicking wrote: > Agreed. "any" sounds the most descriptive. > > / Jonas > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote: > > > > On March 14, 2014 at 9:58:59 AM, Mounir Lamouri (mounir@lamouri.fr) wrote: > >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, at 16:09, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >> > However it does mean that we need to also have a way to define that > >> > orientation should be completely unlocked. This is needed since the > >> > manifest spec allows overriding the default unlocked orientation. I.e. > >> > it should be possible to use the manifest to say that an app should be > >> > in portrait mode, but then allow a page to temporarily override that > >> > to allow any orientation. > >> > >> Good point. I meant to mention that in the email but obviously forgot. I > >> was wondering between 'any', 'all' or 'sensor' (or 'sensor-all'? :)). > > > > `any` should be fine. > > > > > > > > >
Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 20:36:46 UTC