- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:00:59 -0800
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CADh5Ky0FTqNvbM-6J-aeEpew1=Zs_rj6yTvhboq8vKT+OPGPag@mail.gmail.com>
Just a quick update: working on an update, will post here as soon as I have all of the ducks in a row. :DG< On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:17 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > >> Hi Dimitri All, >> >> FYI, yesterday I moved all of the Web Components specs in PubStatus to >> its own table [PubStatus-WC] to help address the "so, what is the status of >> Web Components standardization in WebApps" use case (as well as to be >> consistent with the way PubStatus organizes the Widgets spec suite). >> >> Although PubStatus provides current data about the state of WebApps' >> specs, other than the Plans data (which is typically quite terse or empty), >> PubStatus doesn't facilitate Editors documenting more "forward looking" >> information such as roadmaps, longer term expectations, etc. Given this, >> and the broad interest in Web Components, I think it would be useful if >> there was some type of "state of Web Components standardization" that >> included things like: >> >> * Expectations for the specs by EoY 2014 >> >> * Status and plans of Web Component native implementations (f.ex. >> information beyond what is available in CanIUse.com and >> ChromeStatus.com/features) >> >> * Status and plans of Web Component polyfills >> >> * Key open issues, dependencies >> >> * Testing status and plans >> >> * Deployment status >> >> Thus, when someone asks "so, what do we expect for the state of Web >> Components standardization by the end of 2014?", we have a document/thread >> we can point to (and that document could be a reply to this email, a blog, >> etc.). WDYT? >> > > I think it's reasonable. I've been away from the keyboard for a little bit > and am still digging out from the email backlog, so please be patient with > me :) > > >> >> (BTW, I'm not picking on Dimitri here (who has done exemplary work, >> especially regarding professional community engagement). I wold be >> *delighted* if other Editors would provide similar information for their >> specs.) >> > > Yay, I love being delightful! > > >> >> -Thanks, ArtB >> >> [PubStatus-WC] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Web_ >> Components_Specifications> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 19:01:27 UTC