Re: CFCs for ordinary drafts, was CFC for Re: "W3C" XHR, was Re: [admin] Draft of updated charter available for review from Charles McCathie Nevile on 2014-01-27 (public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2014)

From: Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 18:17:05 +0100
To: "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xacvmrpay3oazb@chaals.local>

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 16:48:18 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> Hi Art,
> I'm wondering if we can change the group's work mode to not requiring  
> CFCs for ordinary working drafts? Unless I'm not getting something, they  
> seem to add an unnecessary delay to getting stuff published.

Yes, I strongly support that proposal.

There is no process requirement that there be a formal Call for Consensus  
for "heartbeat" drafts, and no barrier to a group adopting a general  
process of simply publishing them whenever the editors are ready.

cheers

Chaals

> Kind regards,
> Marcos
>

-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
       chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Monday, 27 January 2014 17:17:41 UTC