- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 16:09:41 +0200
- To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Xiaoqian Cindy Wu <xiaoqian@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote: > I'm not a fan of shelving v1, I'd rather remove the ECMAscript binding from > v1 and keep only the syntax (v2 should contain everything as there are > additions to the syntax). Because? Who is going to supply resources for that? IDL has three to six months of outstanding bugs. Talking about taking it to REC without having resources to work on it at all seems vastly premature. Let alone dealing with this whole v1/v2 mess. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 14:10:09 UTC