Re: Refactoring SharedWorkers out of Web Workers W3C spec

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:42:15 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:

> One of the issues here is  `missing data`.

Indeed.

> The first Call for workers Test Results was sent over a half-year ago  
> and another one a few weeks before WebApps' Shenzhen meeting. Despite  
> those requests, the workers implementation report [IR] remains empty.
>
> Simon - would you please add results for Presto?

Done.

First I ran the tests using https://bitbucket.org/ms2ger/test-runner/src  
on a local server, but then I couldn't think of a straight-forward way to  
put the results in the wiki so I just ran the tests manually, too. :-(  
Since most tests are automated it's silly to run them manually and edit a  
wiki page. Is there a better way?

I also found a bug in a test  
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24074

(Actually there were several tests with bugs but I didn't investigate  
further.)

> Kinuko - would you please add results for Chrome (as you said you would  
> do in Shenzhen [Mins])?
>
> Travis - would you please add results for IE?
>
> Another issue is that during the related discussion in Shenzhen, I don't  
> think this new info from Jonas was available. Jonas - can someone please  
> run the tests on FF Nightly (see [IR] or the test suite [Tests])?
>
> Depending on the test results, it might make sense to (re)consider if it  
> still makes sense to create a spec of without shared workers.
>
> -Thanks, ArtB
>
> [IR] <http://www.w3.org/wiki/Webapps/Interop/WebWorkers>
> [Tests] <http://w3c-test.org/web-platform-tests/master/workers/>
> [Mins] <http://www.w3.org/2013/11/12-webapps-minutes.html#item08>
>
>
>


-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 12:32:06 UTC