Re: Regarding: Making the W3C Web SQL Database Specification Active

* Michael Fitchett wrote:
>Since lack of definition is the issue, I would like to recommend a remedy.
>I know SQL experts and great documentation writers who I would gladly hire
>to further define the Web SQL Database specification and fill in the
>missing SQL definition. Is this something that would be possible to help
>revive the specification and get the remaining vendors on board?

(Having a good specification of the SQL syntax and semantics supported
by current versions of SQLite 3.x that can easily be forked, including
for the purposes of "WebSQL", would be nice to have regardless of
whether that makes any web browser vendor want to implement "WebSQL",
especially if it can be done in cooperation with the SQLite developers.)
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Friday, 27 September 2013 14:03:39 UTC