W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: <element> Needs A Beauty Nap

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 10:02:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky3racnin18ZW-yAkgTVACaQM-dXT8mmtDBf_u_uEYVyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com>
Cc: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, William Chen <wchen@mozilla.com>, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>, Blake Kaplan <mrbkap@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>, Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Buchner <daniel@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Quick question: Will we still be able to land HTML Imports sans any Custom
> Element reliance/support? I'd like to retain the ability to import HTML
> files unbound from the parsing of <element> declarations. A significant
> use-case is easily importing a bunch of <template> elements for use in the
> main document - let's not throw the baby out with the bath water (maybe this
> is already the thinking?)

Yep. HTML Imports are standing on their own.

Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:03:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:57 UTC