W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: File API for Review

From: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:18:04 -0400
Cc: Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7E457DB9-7FA7-4D43-B998-1CA8FC6537A5@mozilla.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On Mar 25, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Arun Ranganathan
> <aranganathan@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> So just to be clear, do you think we should remove "500-style" responses altogether, and *completely defer* to network error, which essentially involves throwing on expired / revoked / invalid Blob URLs?  I'm ok with that if so.
> 
> Yeah, I would prefer if we used "network error" consistently
> throughout the platform for "something went wrong with this URL"
> rather than try to re-imagine a non-HTTP situation in terms of HTTP.
> Because it gives nicer to work with events and such out of the box and
> because it makes exposing more detailed information in the future
> easier.


Done.

http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#NetworkError

-- A*
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2013 20:18:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 March 2013 20:18:33 UTC