W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:51:33 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jfZReos4KBUeoMcCEE4HuDpSKcr56-L7gS0H248cuevKQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins, Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
On Mar 18, 2013 10:48 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net> wrote:
> > Le 7 mars 2013 à 18:25, Dimitri Glazkov a écrit :
> >> Here's a first rough draft of the Web Components spec:
> >>
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/components/index.html
> >
> > Cool.
> >
> > I see
> >
> >     <link rel="component" href="/components/heart.html">
> >
> > Do you plan to allow the HTTP counterpart?
> >
> >     Link: </components/heart.html>; rel=component
>
> Does that need to be "allowed"?  I thought the Link header was just
> equivalent, in general, to specify a <link> in your head.
>
> ~TJ
>

Just bringing this up on list as it has come up in conversations offlist:
while not currently valid.for htmk, link for Web components will work in
the body too? #justcheckin
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 14:52:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:58 GMT