Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Philip Walton <philip@philipwalton.com>wrote:

> Personally, I had no objection to rel="component". It's similar in
> usage to rel="stylesheet" in the fact that it's descriptive of what you're
> linking to.
>
> On the other hand, rel="include" is very broad. It could just as easily
> apply to a stylesheet as a Web component, and may limit the usefulness of
> the term if/when future rel values are introduced.
>
> (p.s. I'm new to this list and haven't read through all the previous
> discussions on Web components. Feel free to disregard this comment if I'm
> rehashing old topics)
>
>
>
+1, I like rel="component", document or include doesn't make sense.

- E