W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

From: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:35:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPJYB1jJOW6Mgqva+838uTUJ2fNOYLPKAzVOx8FEMdBrLPU5kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Walton <philip@philipwalton.com>
Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>, Robert Ginda <rginda@chromium.org>, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Philip Walton <philip@philipwalton.com>wrote:

> Personally, I had no objection to rel="component". It's similar in
> usage to rel="stylesheet" in the fact that it's descriptive of what you're
> linking to.
>
> On the other hand, rel="include" is very broad. It could just as easily
> apply to a stylesheet as a Web component, and may limit the usefulness of
> the term if/when future rel values are introduced.
>
> (p.s. I'm new to this list and haven't read through all the previous
> discussions on Web components. Feel free to disregard this comment if I'm
> rehashing old topics)
>
>
>
+1, I like rel="component", document or include doesn't make sense.

- E
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 22:36:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:58 GMT