- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:14:23 +0000
- To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: > That's not the problem, that's a feature :) Think of it as a > <template> tag for documents. I'd think that author expectations would be different given how external CSS resources work, but maybe. As for the API, do we really want that to be a synchronous API? That seems future-hostile for two reasons: we want to do more in parallel (Servo) and we definitely do not want cross-origin to be synchronous in this manner I think. Maybe it's better if we provide message port access between the Document objects? And if this is mostly for applying components to documents, maybe we should not expose API for that so that it the declarative way can be optimized. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 11 March 2013 17:15:05 UTC