- From: Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:15:41 -0800
- To: Bronislav Klu�ka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 21:16:13 UTC
Agree. Seems like Dimitri and Anne decided that these targets are 'document', did they not? Scott On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Bronislav Klučka < Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com> wrote: > hi > let's apply KISS here > how about just > rel="document" > or > rel="htmldocument" > > Brona > > > On 8.3.2013 22:05, Dimitri Glazkov wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com> wrote: >> >>> Indeed. Unfortunately, using 'module' here could be confusing wrt ES6 >>> modules. Perhaps "package" is better? >>> >>> The name is difficult. My main point is that using "components" causes >>> unnecessary confusion. >>> >> I understand. Welcome to the 2013 Annual Naming Contest/bikeshed. Rules: >> >> 1) must reflect the intent and convey the meaning. >> 2) link type and name of the spec must match. >> 3) no biting. >> >> :DG< >> >> > > >
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 21:16:13 UTC