W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

From: Scott Miles <sjmiles@google.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:15:41 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHbmOLZrJQ5NBagrOEyVD1Zzv9u8KBhCGj0B+fLL9aOxSF4B1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bronislav Klučka <Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Agree. Seems like Dimitri and Anne decided that these targets are
'document', did they not?

Scott


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Bronislav Klučka <
Bronislav.Klucka@bauglir.com> wrote:

> hi
> let's apply KISS here
> how about just
> rel="document"
> or
> rel="htmldocument"
>
> Brona
>
>
> On 8.3.2013 22:05, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed. Unfortunately, using 'module' here could be confusing wrt ES6
>>> modules. Perhaps "package" is better?
>>>
>>> The name is difficult. My main point is that using "components" causes
>>> unnecessary confusion.
>>>
>> I understand. Welcome to the 2013 Annual Naming Contest/bikeshed. Rules:
>>
>> 1) must reflect the intent and convey the meaning.
>> 2) link type and name of the spec must match.
>> 3) no biting.
>>
>> :DG<
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 21:16:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:58 GMT