W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

From: Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:30:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+rMWZhhs3wxqKeYs2_e8RCC_42SoipuToa0hCjdS=wx5ZQLZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Indeed. Unfortunately, using 'module' here could be confusing wrt ES6
modules. Perhaps "package" is better?

The name is difficult. My main point is that using "components" causes
unnecessary confusion.


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com> wrote:
> > I also find the name confusing. It's common to use the term 'component'
> when
> > describing the functionality of a custom element.
> >
> > What about "HTML Modules"?
>
> Then we probably need to rename link rel="module" for consistency?
>
> :DG<
>
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 20:38:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:58 GMT