Re: [webcomponents]: First stab at the Web Components spec

Indeed. Unfortunately, using 'module' here could be confusing wrt ES6
modules. Perhaps "package" is better?

The name is difficult. My main point is that using "components" causes
unnecessary confusion.


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Steve Orvell <sorvell@google.com> wrote:
> > I also find the name confusing. It's common to use the term 'component'
> when
> > describing the functionality of a custom element.
> >
> > What about "HTML Modules"?
>
> Then we probably need to rename link rel="module" for consistency?
>
> :DG<
>