- From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:17:56 +0100
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- CC: Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 19/02/2013 05:56 , Travis Leithead wrote: > Alex, work on Editing APIs was ongoing in the Community Group > (http://www.w3.org/community/editing/) though their draft is just under > a year old. My recall is a bit rusty on that one, but I think that the situation was that: • WebApps is not chartered to publish this, so a CG was created. • But having the discussion on the CG list seemed like a bad idea since everyone is here, so the mailing list for discussion was decided to be public-webapps. I actually pinged Aryeh about this a week or two ago, but I haven't heard back. I'd be happy to take over as editor for this spec, it's a feature I've wanted to have work right forever. In order to make that happen (assuming that Aryeh agrees, or doesn't speak up), I propose the following: • Since I'm financed to work on HTML, transition this to an HTML extension spec (this probably only requires a few changes to the header). • The discussion can stay here (wherever people prefer that I'm already subscribed to — I really don't care). • The spec gets published through the HTML WG, since I believe it's actually viably in scope there already. All of the above assumes you're all happy with it, and the HTML people too. I reckon it could work though. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 09:18:10 UTC