W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

RfR: Progress Events Test Cases; deadline January 28

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 14:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <50F9A415.6070604@nokia.com>
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org" <public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
This is a WG-wide Request for Review [RfR] for all of the tests Ms2ger 
and Samsung submitted for the Progress Events CR [CR]:

<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/>
<http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Samsung/>

Jungkee noted in the e-mail below, he believes these tests cover the 
CR's assertions thus they should sufficient to test the CR exit criteria.

If you have any comments, please send them to 
public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org by January 28.

If you review any set of the tests and find no issues, please state that 
as a reply to this RfR (so we can get a sense of whether or not anyone 
reviewed the tests).

In the absence of any comments, these tests will be considered Approved 
by the WG.

-Thanks, AB

[RfR] http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/Approval
[CR] http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-progress-events-20110922/

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[PE] added test cases
Resent-Date: 	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:01:28 +0000
Resent-From: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>
Date: 	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:57:33 +0900
From: 	ext Jungkee Song <jungkees@gmail.com>
To: 	<public-webapps-testsuite@w3.org>



Hi,

I would like to volunteer as a test facilitator for Progress Events
spec. I just submitted three test cases:

For 4.1 Firing events using the ProgressEvent interface for HTTP,
[ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/firing-events-http-content-length.html
[ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/firing-events-http-no-content-length.html

For 4.4 Security Considerations,
[ProgressEvents]/tests/submissions/Samsung/security-consideration.html

They somehow seem to be taken care of in more detail by the
specifications implementing Progress Events such as XHR, but I've
tried to extend the coverage to the entire sections.

I believe the test cases that Ms2ger has contributed and the three
above together cover all the assertions in the spec.

Can we call RfR for the test cases?
..../submissions/Ms2ger
..../submissions/Samsung

Regards,
Jungkee


-----------------
Jungkee Song
Samsung Electronics
Received on Friday, 18 January 2013 19:36:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:57 GMT