W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:06:50 -0500
Message-ID: <50EF114A.30604@mit.edu>
To: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 1/10/13 2:02 PM, Vincent Scheib wrote:
> I'm confused why HTML should include the properties, and not the
> respective specifications.

Other than scope creep?

I am too; see the bug I linked to.

-Boris
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2013 19:07:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:57 GMT