- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:12:18 -0500
- To: ext Israel Hilerio <israelh@microsoft.com>
- CC: ext Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org>, Jonas Sicking <sicking@mozilla.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, Eliot Graff <Eliot.Graff@microsoft.com>, Balaji Ramasubramaniam <balajira@microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 1/4/13 4:35 PM, ext Israel Hilerio wrote: > We don't see the need to go back to LC. Most of the feedback was editorial. The other feedback we received, seems to have been agreed on by the iplementers & WG but not documented in the spec. We believe that addressing the bugs till the end of July is reasonable to move forward to CR. Until we have a specific proposal and a clear list of differences (i.e. a diff and optionally a short summary of each change), we don't have enough information to make a decision re LCWD vs. CR. > In December Eliot and I put together a plan to address the LC comments and catalog the bugs that came after the LC deadline. We're already have addressed many of them. Unfortunately, the holidays slowed us down a bit. We'll put something together and send it to the WG if that makes sense. > > Would that work? Yes, that seems like a reasonable plan to me. -Thanks, AB
Received on Saturday, 5 January 2013 13:12:59 UTC