- From: Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 09:48:43 -0700
- To: "piranna@gmail.com" <piranna@gmail.com>
- Cc: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>, Tony Ross <tross@microsoft.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
It (the template element) has already shipped in Chrome and has also landed in Firefox Nightly builds. On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:22 AM, piranna@gmail.com <piranna@gmail.com> wrote: > When this would be spected to be implemented on browsers? Any knows of at > least partial implementation except the mdv polyfill? > > El 14/06/2013 15:18, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com> escribió: > >> On 6/14/13 9:02 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/2013 17:59 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of >>>>> the >>>>> HTML Templates spec using the following document as the basis (it does >>>>> not >>>>> yet use the LC template): >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcomponents/raw-file/tip/spec/templates/index.html> >>>> >>>> >>>> There's an open bug on integrating this into HTML proper which will >>>> clearly happen. Why do we need to continue with this draft? >>> >>> >>> I agree with Anne. And since this group considered the feature stable >>> enough to go to LC I went ahead and imported <template> into HTML. >>> >>> You can see the changes here: >>> >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/2502feb541063a3834f1ef07e2a23d0824d96914 >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/daaf6bc1e76365b6678a14b47954bcf9c5db54c6 >>> >>> >>> The result is live at: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/templating.html >> >> >> Thanks Robin and Anne. >> >> I moved HTML Templates to WebApps' "Specs No Longer Active" table [1]. >> >> AFAIC (can't speak for Chaals'), I consider this CfC canceled. >> >> -AB >> >> [1] >> <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/PubStatus#Specs_NO_Longer_Active>. >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 14 June 2013 16:49:09 UTC