- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:41:21 +0100
- To: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Takeshi Yoshino <tyoshino@google.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com> wrote: > Since we have Streams implemented to some degree, I'd love to hear suggestions to improve it relative to IO. Anne can you summarize the points you've made on the other various threads? I recommend reading through http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2013JanMar/thread.html#msg569 Problems: * Too much complexity for being an Blob without synchronous size. * The API is bad. The API for File is bad too, but we cannot change it, this however is new. And I think we really want an IO API that's not about incremental, but can actively discard incoming data once it's processed. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 17:41:53 UTC