- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 12:42:53 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On the second thought: why not make imports dynamic, just like stylesheets? :DG< On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Hajime Morrita <morrita@google.com> wrote: >>> Just after started prototyping HTML Imports on Blink, this idea comes to my >>> mind: Why not have <import> for HTML Imports? >> >> Because changing parsing for <head> is not done, basically. >> >> rel=import not being dynamic kinda sucks though. Maybe we should >> consider using <meta>? It has a bunch of uses that are non-dynamic. > > I used <link> primarily because most of the <link rel="stylesheet"> > plumbing seems to fit best with <link rel="import">. > > Interesting idea about <meta>... > > :DG<
Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 19:43:21 UTC