Re: A very preliminary draft of a URL spec

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Charles McCathie Nevile
<chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> I am checking that it will actually get implementation - since a spec of
> "things we think people should do, but they don't and probably won't" is
> just an idea written down.

Yeah, I think this shows that you have not actually checked HTML's
dependencies and what is implemented today. <a>.protocol and such most
definitely exist today and the way that is defined is through the URL
Standard.

And FWIW, the whole point of doing STD66 again is precisely about
fixing edge cases and having that extremely detailed algorithm. If
those did not matter we could just use STD66.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Tuesday, 14 May 2013 16:31:31 UTC