Re: [PointerLock] Should there be onpointerlockchange/onpointerlockerror properties defined in the spec from Anne van Kesteren on 2013-04-11 (public-webapps@w3.org from April to June 2013)

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:48:11 +0100
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADnb78jVfDT_5Y_vhns+OWLWw8W7QK0_6Jd6CP_hquACJU0ddA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> Isn't the thing that matters whether _sites_ have it unprefixed?

I don't know. I believe the browsers don't match each other exactly
either so there's probably some wiggle room. I suspect transitioning
at this point to be hard whatever we do, which is probably why it has
not happened yet.

Also, we dispatch fullscreenchange to more than just the requesting
document. We could still get rid of fullscreenerror though and have
the simple non-iframe case be much more friendly towards developers.


--
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Thursday, 11 April 2013 17:48:38 UTC