- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 17:17:17 +1000
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Jonas, I don't get a good sense from this proposal (and NavigationController) about what the scope of an application is. E.g., if both http://example.com/fooApp and http://example.com/barApp say that they both grab the URL http://example.com/app who wins? More to the point, what's stopping http://users.example.edu/~bob/ from taking over responses from http://users.example.edu/~alice/ ? Also along these lines - I see an outstanding question that some people want to host multiple apps on the same URL. Is that really wise? If anything, I'd go the other way and say that one hostname = one app; then the scoping of and separation between apps is intuitive (e.g., fooApp.example.com, barApp.example.com). You could even define a well-known location for the manifest, so that people could just type the hostname in to install / view the app... Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 07:17:49 UTC