Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

On 12/02/2012 12:07 PM, Jungkee Song wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sure there is if the W3C version is stale, as is the case here.
>
> I don't think it's a technical issue to discuss. There should be
> corresponding publication rules.
>
> Art, Charles, Doug,
> Can you help clarifying which links we have to use?
>
> In the proposed version, I've changed the links to the following specs:
> - [CORS], [DOM], [DOMPS], [HTML] from the WHATWG version to the latest
> W3C TR doc.
> - [FILEAPI], [PROGRESSEVENTS], [WEBIDL] from the latest W3C ED to the
> latest W3C TR doc.

Please revert all those changes.

Thank you
Ms2ger

Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 12:14:42 UTC