W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 18:54:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+ez_hYG7-ijnyHJ4DgGxS7AXhn7q3s7hothBUsN4g2hxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I object to this publication because of this change:
> >>
> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/2341e31323a4
> >>
> >> pushed with a misleading commit message.
> >
> > since you don't say what is misleading, and since commit messages are
> > irrelevant for W3C process, this  objection is immaterial
>
> Ms2ger objected to the change, not the commit message, so your
> objection to the objection is misplaced.
>
> However, the commit message isn't long, so it's not difficult to
> puzzle out what ey might be referring to.  In this case, it's the
> implication that changing a bunch of normative references from WHATWG
> specs to W3C copies of the specs is somehow necessary "according to
> pubrules".
>

Then whomever ms2ger is should say so. In any case, there  is no reason to
reference a WHATWG document if there is a W3C counterpart.
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 01:55:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT