W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [pointer-lock] pointerLockElement should be nullable in the IDL

From: Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:56:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAK-EfX=Y_yGuAgSKjQ2gPZAJWeQxp-MTuFsEEbqyzUJv2amRjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Thanks, updated to use the nullable type.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/rev/ecf0846c2f8f


On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> The IDL at http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/**pointerlock/raw-file/default/**
> index.html#extensions-to-the-**document-interface<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/raw-file/default/index.html#extensions-to-the-document-interface>says:
>
>     readonly attribute Element pointerLockElement;
>
> but the attribute can return null, so the type should be "Element?".
>
> -Boris
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 22:57:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT