W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: CfC: publish WD of XHR; deadline November 29

From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 01:43:58 +0800
Message-ID: <50AFB5DE.8030704@oupeng.com>
To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
(12/11/24 1:28), Adam Barth wrote:
>> Now, that being said and seeing as we cannot put Anne as an editor of the
>> W3C version of the spec (because, technically, he's not). How do you guys
>> suggest we go about acknowledging the WHATWG source? Where in the spec? How?
>> With what kind of wording?
> 
> I would recommend acknowledging the WHATWG upfront in the Status of
> this Document.  The document currently reads:
> 
> ---8<---
> This document is produced by the Web Applications (WebApps) Working
> Group. The WebApps Working Group is part of the Rich Web Clients
> Activity in the W3C Interaction Domain.
> --->8---

Just in case folks don't know. HTML5 also has a paragraph like this in
the Status of this Document:

  # The bulk of the text of this specification is also available in the
  # WHATWG HTML Living Standard, under a license that permits reuse of
  # the specification text.

Another possibility is to say something like

  | Anne van Kesteran authored most of the text in the spec.

in the Acknowledgment section. I'd note that in CSS specs an
Acknowledgment section is not always just a list of names and so suppose
this is doable.

I'm not pushing for this though, as I find this quite obvious.

> Perhaps Anne would be willing to suggest some text that he would find
> appropriate?

+1, or perhaps Anne would like to object to this CfC no matter what?



Cheers,
Kenny
-- 
Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing
Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Friday, 23 November 2012 17:44:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT