W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Call for Consensus: CORS to Candidate Recommendation

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:59:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+e610yWZ_2CnqSWu7tyjj_Xb2vOk3_TumsFjrgvrZaqkA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
Cox will file an FO (as a W3C member) if it is not fixed.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com> wrote:

> I object to making such a change.
>
>
> On 11/16/2012 02:32 PM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> Before going to CR, I believe the [HTML] entry in the references section
>> needs to be changed to reference an appropriate W3C specification. A
>> present, it reference a non-W3C document.
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>  On 11/15/12 5:31 PM, ext Hill, Brad wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I have placed a draft for review at:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/****webappsec/cors-draft/<http://www.w3.org/2011/**webappsec/cors-draft/>
>>>> <http://**www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/**cors-draft/<http://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/cors-draft/>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And this is a Call for Consensus among the WebAppSec and WebApps WGs to
>>>> take this particular text (with necessary additions to the Status of
>>>> this
>>>> Document section if approved) forward to Candidate Recommendation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I support this CfC although I am wondering about the CR exit criteria.
>>>
>>> Do you expect to re-use the CSP1.0 criteria:
>>>
>>> [[
>>> The entrance criteria for this document to enter the Proposed
>>> Recommendation stage is to have a minimum of two independent and
>>> interoperable user agents that implementation all the features of this
>>> specification, which will be determined by passing the user agent tests
>>> defined in the test suite developed by the Working Group.
>>> ]]
>>>
>>> My preference is what WebApps has used in other CRs because I think it is
>>> clearer that a single implementation is not required to pass every test
>>> but
>>> that at least two implementations must pass every test. F.ex.:
>>>
>>>     <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-****websockets-20120920/#crec<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**websockets-20120920/#crec>
>>> <ht**tp://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-**websockets-20120920/#crec<http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/#crec>
>>> >
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -Thanks, AB
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 14:00:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT