Re: [PE] interface MessageEvent : ProgressEvent

On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com> wrote:
> I think the MessageEvent interface derived from ProgressEvent interface would solve many such use cases. It seems we already have candidates: server-sent events, web socket, cross-document messaging, channel messaging, web worker.
>
> WDYT?

I'm struggling to see how this makes sense. Sure, we might want
progress indication for some of these, but why would you use the
MessageEvent interface in that? How does that work?


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 12:19:46 UTC