W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

[PE] Start working on Progress Events

From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:52:46 +0900
To: public-webapps@w3.org
Message-id: <028901cdc3a5$7543a500$5fcaef00$%song@samsung.com>
Hi all,

I came to start working on Progress Events spec to move it towards REC. Because the spec is already a CR, I am planning to focus on satisfying the exit criteria to ship it. Please see inline comments and questions.

Jungkee


> From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:art.barstow@nokia.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 10:51 PM
> 
> On 11/15/12 3:11 AM, ext Jungkee Song wrote:
> > Hi Art, Charles and Anne,
> >
> > At this stage, it will be of great help if you give me some comments on
> any issues, concerns, expected actions, etc.
> 
> Since the spec is already a CR (with exit criteria
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-progress-events-20110922/#crec>), some
> questions ...
> 
> * Are there any significant differences between the CR and Anne's WHATWG
> spec? If yes, what are they and should they postponed to v.next?


As I've gone through it, there's no significant change. There are only a few minor ones including term (octets to bytes) and xref (to event definition) things.


> * What is the implementation status of the CR? Are there at least two
> independent implementations that can be tested?


This is my question at the moment. Can anyone share implementation data for this spec?


> * Are the tests in the test suite sufficient to test the CR
> <http://w3c-test.org/webapps/ProgressEvents/tests/submissions/Ms2ger/>?
> If not, what is the plan to fill the gaps?


I will scope it out.


> BTW, I have a relatively strong preference to have this conversation  on
> public-webapps so please feel free to copy any part of what I say above
> to that list.
> 
> -Thanks, Art
Received on Friday, 16 November 2012 02:53:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT