W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Two years on and still no sensible web storage solutions exist

From: Joshua Bell <jsbell@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:57:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD649j50Fr_UUDAsh7pXoQc9kuVC++wXw6Uof29xzW8W_ss8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com>, Charles McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>, Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>, Todd Blanchard <toddvblanchard@gmail.com>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
For anyone that's confused, I sent from the wrong email address so non-list
recipients received my reply but the list did not.

And Kyle's right, as I realized when following up before re-sending.

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Joshua Bell <jsbell@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Per the spec, anything the structured cloning algorithm [1] handles can
>> be used as record values in IndexedDB. ArrayBuffers are not on that list,
>> but Chrome does support them in IndexedDB.
>>
>
> The TypedArray spec specifies how to structured clone ArrayBuffers.
>
> http://www.khronos.org/registry/typedarray/specs/latest/#9.1
>
> - Kyle
>
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 17:58:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT