W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

RE: Making offline apps easier?

From: <arnaud.braud@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:52:08 +0000
To: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <25873_1352739134_50A1293E_25873_2652_1_0AE7120F487393448390B55BE14C3C24039D3C@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Hello,
Some comments inline,

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Charles McCathie Nevile [mailto:chaals@yandex-team.ru]
> Envoyé : lundi 12 novembre 2012 17:11
> À : public-webapps WG
> Objet : Making offline apps easier?
> 
> Hi folks
> 
> We have a handful of things that could be on our plate here.
> 
> 1. Appcache.
> Yeah, we know. But if nobody makes a proposal, nothing will get better.
> (There is also a "fixing-appcache" community group taht might come here
> with proposals).
> 2. Offline apps breakout at TPAC
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/TPAC2012/Offline_Apps Ashok Malhotra (Oracle,
> who aren't webapps members), ran a session. Where we agreed to divide
> the thoughts into "the app shell" and "the app data" - either of which
> could be brought from offline, or online, independently. Plus I made a
> half-page note about different ways of having apps offline 3. File APIs.
> The plain File reader seems almost done. Still. There are apparently
> people interested in a File System (Opera implemented one for Opera
> Unite, Chrome and Yandex have one, and there are discussions about
> making a simpler one).
> 4. Databases
> IndexedDB seems to be getting traction across all platforms. Unlike at
> the face to face, when literally nobody spoke in favour of WebSQL,
> there are people who think it is worthwhile. At the same time Ashok has
> been hinting at using something more seriously SQL to help with issues
> like synch (which always seems like it won't be that hard, but never
> actually works entirely properly after all).
> 5. Widgets and packaged apps
> There is the "official" widget stack. At the face to face the only
> people who spoke up in favour of keeping this alive and connected to
> other app systems were Zynga. There is the Mozilla proposal for apps
> packaged with a JSON manifest, and Yandex has the same functionality
> but probably slightly different syntax for the JS. And there may be
> others...


I'd also add a 
6) Zip Archive : which was discussed at last TPAC.

It might be worth trying to flatten our use cases and see where we have huge gaps and avoid running too many specs for one given use case.


> 
> 
> cheers
> 
> Chaals
> 
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - Consultant (web standards) CTO Office, Yandex
>          chaals@yandex-team.ru         Find more at http://yandex.com



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 16:52:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:56 GMT