W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: [widgets] Does anyone still care about Widget Updates?

From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:37:51 +0100
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-Id: <12E5B6E1-EF54-451A-9164-086BB192C908@gmail.com>
To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>

On 20 Oct 2012, at 13:12, Arthur Barstow wrote:

> For various reasons, a Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates was never published, although the CfC to do so passed and the ED is prepared as such [widget-updates].
> 
> Since no one has raised this as an issue, I would like feedback on what we should do with this spec. The main options are: 1) to stop work (and publish a WG Note); 2) to move forward with the CR.
> 
> I don'tthink it makes much sense to move the spec to CR if we do not have  commitments for at least two independent implementations of the CR. Therefore, Implementors should please speak up if they willcommit to implementing this CR.

Its implemented in Apache Wookie from version 0.13.

> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> [widget-updates] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-updates/>
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: 	CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Updates; deadline May 2
> Resent-Date: 	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:42:00 +0000
> Resent-From: 	<public-native-web-apps@w3.org>
> Date: 	Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:41:34 -0400
> From: 	ext Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
> To: 	public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
> CC: 	<public-native-web-apps@w3.org>
> 
> 
> 
> The comment deadline for the Widget Updates LCWD ended April 19. No
> comments were submitted for that document so this is a Call for
> Consensus to publish a Candidate Recommendation of the spec using the LC
> as the basis <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-widgets-updates-20120322/>.
> 
> The Exit Criteria for the CR will be the same as that used for the other
> widget specs, namely that two or more implementations must pass each
> test case.
> 
> This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
> decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
> Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process Document:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
> 
> Positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be
> considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for comments is
> May 2 and all comments should be sent to public-webapps at w3.org.
> 
> -Thanks, AB
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 22 October 2012 13:38:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:55 GMT