- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:58:53 -0700
- To: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com> wrote: > Last time I looked at it, WebIDL said [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing] is meant to > be for legacy API's, and not new ones. I think that a bit strange and > counter productive. Why? [TreatUndefinedAs] is only intended for arguments that take DOMString or DOMString?. http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#TreatUndefinedAs / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:00:06 UTC