W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:58:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+c2ei8P-3uziWG7QkxrAx7KgtSS2p_PwaFBtYjNBXr5EVewmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Odin HÝrthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>
Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Odin HÝrthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com> wrote:
> Last time I looked at it, WebIDL said [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing] is meant to
> be for legacy API's, and not new ones. I think that a bit strange and
> counter productive. Why?

[TreatUndefinedAs] is only intended for arguments that take DOMString
or DOMString?.

http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#TreatUndefinedAs

/ Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:00:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:55 GMT