W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: IndexedDB: undefined parameters

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 14:12:36 -0400
Message-ID: <50746914.9090303@mit.edu>
To: public-webapps@w3.org
On 10/9/12 1:52 PM, Joshua Bell wrote:
> The IDB spec does not have [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing] specified on
> openCursor()'s arguments (or anywhere else), so I believe Chrome's
> behavior here is correct.

It looks correct as the spec is currently written.

It's not clear to me why the spec is written the way it is.  It could 
just as easily define that if the "any" value is undefined, it's 
ignored.  Or it could use [TreatUndefinedAs=Missing], indeed.

Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 18:13:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 27 October 2017 07:26:49 UTC