W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: CfC: publish LCWD of Pointer Lock; deadline Oct 4

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:32:44 -0400
Message-ID: <506ED36C.5040000@nokia.com>
To: "public-webapps@w3c.org" <public-webapps@w3c.org>, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>
On 9/27/12 8:26 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
> This is a Call for Consensus to publish a LCWD of Pointer Lock using 
> the following document as the basis for the LC 
> <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pointerlock/raw-file/tip/index.html>.
>
> This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's 
> decision to request advancement" for this LCWD. Note the Process 
> Document states the following regarding the significance/meaning of a 
> LCWD:
>
> [[
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
>
> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant 
> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) 
> in the Working Draft;
>
> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant 
> dependencies with other groups;
>
> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these 
> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement 
> is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the 
> technical report to later maturity levels.
> ]]
>
> The proposed LC review period is 4 weeks.
>
> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please send them 
> to public-webapps@w3.org by October 4 at the latest. Positive response 
> is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as 
> agreement with the proposal.

Hi All - given the discussion in the "Is Pointer Lock feature complete 
i.e. LC ready?" thread (see f.ex. [1] and follow-ons), it appears we 
don't yet have consensus the spec is ready for LCWD.

As such, I recommend we work toward consensus on the issues raised in 
this thread before proceeding with the LCWD. To help people track the 
issues raised, perhaps it would be helpful to create a related bug [2] 
(and to add a link to [2] in Status of the Document section).

-AB

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012OctDec/0010.html
[2] 
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Pointer%20Lock&resolution=---
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 12:33:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 18:49:55 GMT